There are two directions to take with this: the one is to try and
simplify the integrand, then see what there is in the table, and the
other is to look at the table and see what form it makes sense to
shoot for. I tend to do the former, but that may be because I'm more
familiar with the table.
Let's think about what the table gives us: there are integrands with
- products of eax,
sin(bx), cos(cx), and p(x) (a
polynomial),
- powers of sin(x), cos(x) and products of powers
of these functions,
- factored quadratic terms (x-a)(x-b)
in the denominators of fractions,
- plain quadratics x2+a2 in the denominators of fractions,
and
- quadratics of the form x2+/-a2 in square roots in the numerator
or denominator of a fraction.
So if we want to use the table, we have to be able to turn our
integral into one of these forms. (Aside: is there any percentage in
memorizing these? It's probably worth remembering what they generally
look like, if not the exact terms in them.)
What transformations are we going to need to use these? I can think
of a couple of different types (this is not an exhaustive list, but
probably hits the high points):
- substitutions to simplify a compound function (for example,
x2 cos5(x3)) before applying a rule,
- related to this, getting rid of linear terms in a function,
e.g., substituting to get rid of the 2x+1 in
e2x+1,
- rewriting polynomials to get the right quadratic form (usually
by completing the square---for example, y2 + 4x + 5 =
(y+2)2 + 1---and
then substituting accordingly, and
- simplifying a rational function (a polynomial divided by
another) with degree greater than or equal to the numerator by
either substituting or doing long division---see example 8
in section 7.4, for example.
There are, of course, other possibilities.