9 March 1998
Rigorous Mathematical Contractors, Inc.
Suite 3, Strawmarket Business Plaza
Lonlinc, SK 04685
Dear Rimac:
As you know, we have here at the Rocket Tech Division of Utoff A.F.~Base been involved in the development of the space station Omfreed, a project for which we have utilized your company's formidable mathematical expertise in the past. We are currently considering the structural integrity of the beams that are used to support different sections of the structure, in an effort to determine the manner in which they will respond to the rigors of extended use on the space station.
The situation which we are considering is shown in figure 1. As seen there, there is a central mass m (the ball at the center of the figure) connected to two beams, at the ends of which a force T pressing inwards is imposed. This results in a force Fc pushing the mass upwards. The upwards force is opposed by a structural force in the system, shown in the diagram as Fr. The effect of the force is to produce a displacement y, which is the deflection of the mass from an initially horizontal position.
The engineers that have been working on this problem have suggested that Fr may be modeled as a nonlinear spring force, Fr = a(y - y0)2 + b(y-y0)3 + c(y-y0), where y0 is the initial position of the mass (which may be a measure of initial imperfections in the system) and a, b, and c are constants characterizing the ``spring.'' The compressional force Fc is given approximately by Fc = 2 d y, where d is again a constant---in this case, measuring the magnitude of the forces T.
Based on this information, we need from you a mathematical model for
the deflection of the mass in figure 1, and based on this a prediction
for what will happen to the mass as the compressional force Fc is
increased. From the work of a resident mathematician who was able to
briefly turn her attention to the project, we expect that you should
be able to write this model in the form
As our manufacturing specifications are at worst exemplary, you should consider in the greatest depth the case y0=0, and then give some indication of how the results you obtain change when y0 nonzero. We would like your results to be as generally stated as possible, but observe that you may find it expedient in some cases to consider h = 0.75 and, where appropriate, D = 0.1.
We are under some pressure to forge ahead with the development of Omfreed, having been beset by delays in other parts of the program. We therefore need your final 4--10 page report by the 6th of April. If you should have questions regarding your investigation, please feel free to contact Dr. Gavin LaRose, a technical expert in many fields, with whom we have an affiliation for this project through the space agency. Please note that you should in any event contact him with an update on your progress on two occasions -- on or before the 13th and 30th of March. Sample report formats are also available from Dr. LaRose.
We look forward to hearing from you.
Sincerely
Lieutenant General Rick N. Backer
Commander, Rocket Tech Division
rnb:glr